The Treadmill Vo2max Test Physical Education Essay

9 male competitory Badminton participants ( mean ( SD ) age 19.9 ( 1.7 ) old ages ; height 177 ( 3.0 ) centimeter ; organic structure mass 78.5 ( 8.0 ) kilogram ; viing at university and regional degrees volunteered to participated in the survey. Subject ‘s tallness was recorded utilizing a stadiometer ( Holtain Fixed Stadiometer, Crosswell, Pembs ) and weight was recorded utilizing SECA digitally balanced graduated tables ( SECA- Model 770, Vogel & A ; Halke, Hamburg, Germany ) . For both measurings jocks were measured without have oning places and in standard athleticss vesture of a jersey and playing trunkss. All participants provided written informed consent for the survey, which was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Wales Institute Cardiff.

Pilot Study

A pilot survey was conducted prior to the start of participant proving in order to measure the protocol and familiarize myself with the proving equipment and processs. The pilot survey was conducted for the treadmill VO2max trial by a individual voluntary who provided written informed consent and completed a par Q ( Participant Activity Readiness Questionnaire ) prior to proving. The protocol used consisted of a 4 min warm up at 10 kilometers per hour at a changeless 4 % gradient and a subsequent addition of 1 kilometers per hours every minute at the sane gradient. From the pilot study the proving protocol for the treadmill trial was adapted somewhat, running velocity was reduced to 9 kilometers per hours and gradient was lessening to 3 % , as it was deemed excessively strenuous to supply optimum consequences.

Study protocol

All topics carried out two incremental protocols to exhaustion in randomized order: a treadmill trial ( nonspecific ) and an incremental badminton fittingness trial ( athletics particular ) , every bit good as a badminton specific public presentation trial: Speed endurance trial. Both the treadmill and incremental badminton fittingness trials were performed with instantaneous gas exchange measurings utilizing a Portable Breath by Breath Gas analysis system ( Oxycon Pro and Oxycon Mobile, Jaeger at Viasys Healthcare, Warwickshire, England ) .

Gas Exchange Measurements

Using the Oxycon Mobile breath-by-breath analysis system ( Oxycon Pro and Oxycon Mobile, Jaeger at Viasys Healthcare, Warwickshire, England ) , the undermentioned physiological values were recorded from the jocks during both thorough incremental fittingness trials ; VO2 ( ml/kg/min ) , C dioxide production ; VCO2 ( L/min ) , respiratory exchange ratio ; ( RER=VCO2/VO2 ) , infinitesimal airing ; VE ( L/min ) , take a breathing frequence, and tidal volume. The metabolic system was calibrated harmonizing to the maker ‘s instructions prior to each trial. To graduate the gas analyzer, a criterion gas ( FO2= 15.0 % and FCO2 = 5.0 % ) every bit good as environmental air ( FO2 = 20.93 % and FCO2 = 0.03 % ) was used. The system was carried on the dorsum of the trunk one time to the full set up on the jock. The two chief units were worn on the jocks back alternatively of their forepart during proving, so the equipment did non interfere with the jocks face if it moved about. To farther secure the equipment, a tight lycra top was worn over the system in order to procure it to see no harm was done to the equipment or jock during proving. ( PHOTO )

Heart rate

Heart rate was recorded utilizing Polar electro, RS400 bosom rate proctors ( Polar Electro, RS400, Kemple, Finland ) , and a Polar Interface Unit to present the information into a computing machine. Polar-HR package was used to find parametric quantities such as the upper limit and mean bosom rate of each topic at different phases of the trial. The bosom rate proctors consist of a belt incorporating a brace of electrodes and a carpus receiving system. The belt is attached to the participant ‘s thorax and sends the bosom rate information it to the carpus receiving system, where it is stored and can be unloaded to a computing machine afterwards.

Treadmill proving

The treadmill incremental trial to exhaustion ( TT ) was performed on a motorised treadmill ( Woodway, PPS-55 Sport ; Waukesha, Germany ) and consisted of an initial 4 min uninterrupted work load at 9 kilometers per hour followed by additions of 1 kilometers per hours every minute, all of which performed at a consistent 3 % slope. The trial ended with voluntary exhaustion of the topics. Heart Rate soap was recorded as the highest ascertained bosom rate during the concluding phases of the trial. Gas exchange measurings were carried out continuously throughout the trial. Peak O consumption ( VO2peak ) was determined as the highest O consumption ( VO2 ) averaged over 30 s during the trial. VO2 values are considered maximum when at least two of the undermentioned three standards are satisfied ; ( a ) RER a‰? 1.1, ( B ) maximum bosom rate of less than 15 bpm below age-predicted HRmax ( 220-age ) , and ( degree Celsius ) leveling off of VO2 despite an addition in work. ( REFERENCE )

Field proving

A badminton-Specific incremental fittingness trial ( IT ) was used in which topics repeated motions retroflexing those seen during a game of badminton, at an increasing velocity on the tribunal. Players are required to travel from a cardinal base to the four appendages of the tribunal utilizing Badminton motions ( see figure 2 ) . Movement velocity was controlled by audio signal, and increased after each of the 18 phases of the trial. The trial was designed to be maximum and thorough so participants were instructed to maintain on every bit long as they could. Players where required to confront towards the cyberspace at all times to guarantee realistic motions during the trial.

The trial comprised of up to 18 degrees of increasing strength. As with all incremental trials, it started at a really slow motion velocity assisting the jocks acclimatise to the motion form. After each degree, the motion velocity increased in order to up the strength of each degree. Each degree consisted of three periods of work enduring about 22 seconds with a recovery period enduring for 8 seconds. For every 3rd exercising phase the recovery period increased to 18 seconds.

During the trial the participants were required to return to the cardinal base after each motion and topographic point at least one pes in the box prior to executing the following motion. The audio signal was used to inform the participant when they must be at the cardinal base or one of the appendages of the tribunal. Players were instructed to travel in clip with the audio signal. The trial was finished when the participant could no longer systematically maintain the needed motion velocity ( they fell at least one beep behind the audio signal on three occasions ) or they finished the trial due to exhaustion.

Set up of the tribunals must be as follows ( see Figure. 2 and accounts adapted from Hughes, ( 2003 ) ) .


– Oxygen indicates 3 bird tubings taped together terminal to stop & amp ; taped to floor at points shown

– Shaded boxes indicate where pess must be placed either in cardinal base or in rearcourt during public presentation of the trial.

Figure 2. Layout of tribunal for the endurance trial.

1. 3 taped shuttle tubings were placed on the FH and BH sides in the forecourt country at a point 50 centimeter from the net ( i.e. , Centre of whole tribunal ) and 50cm in from the singles sideline ( labeled ‘1 ‘ & As ; ‘2 ‘ ) .

2. A box was formed utilizing the lines at the rear tribunal, 75 centimeter from the out of bounds, utilizing the exterior of a singles tribunal and the doubles service line ( labeled ‘3 ‘ ) . This was Repeated for backhand side ( labeled ‘4 ‘ ) .

3. The cardinal bases was formed by making a rectangle, 150 centimeter back from the short service line centred on the mid-line. The box was 75 cm broad and 50 centimeter deep.

On Court Speed Endurance Test ( taken from Hughes, 2003 )

Players were required to execute 10 motions across the full breadth of the tribunal every bit rapidly as possible, touching a sum of 10 birds with their racket. Five birds were placed unsloped on the outside tramway on either side of the tribunal. The participant so moved across the tribunal every bit rapidly as possible, strike harding one bird at a clip of the line with their racket until all 10 had been removed. The motions were repeated 10 times with 40 seconds between the start of one set of motions and the start of the following set. The participant was required to execute the trial maximally, with the participant ‘s recovery dependant on how long the participant took to finish the trial. The trial halt ticker was stopped when the participant returned to traverse the Centre line after strike harding all 10 birds of the line. The clip to finish each set of motions was recorded, leting for the mean clip per dash, % weariness and maximum HR information was calculated from the trial consequences.

Notes: If more than one bird was hit, the ‘extra ‘ birds were replaced onto the line to guarantee the participant completed all 10 birds for each set.

Statistical Analysis

Data will be analysed utilizing perennial steps analysis of discrepancy ( ANOVA ) and mated sample T-tests on SPSS ( SPSS 17.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois ) , to place the cogency of the badminton specific VO2max Test and find a nexus between VO2max and Repeated Sprint public presentation in badminton. The analysis will look at the assorted physiological factors assessed during the two VO2max proving processs, every bit good as the informations gathered from the velocity endurance public presentation trial. Trials were used to find important differences between the VO2max derived from the treadmill Test and Incremental On-court Test, every bit good as important differences between maximum bosom rate values attained during all three of the testing processs. A Pearson ‘s correlativity coefficient was besides used to prove the correlativity of the consequences.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *